PlatformDevelop & performDevelopment ManagementNext moduleCompensation Management
Development Management · Skills · Paths · Readiness

Skills and careers, not a spreadsheet on SharePoint.

Competency maps, learning paths, and promotion readiness live next to performance and pay, so development conversations are grounded in what the business actually needs.

2.1×
More internal moves when paths are visible
35%
Reduction in "stuck" ICs year over year (pilot sites)
1 map
From role to learning to promotion criteria
Before · After

Career development, before and after.

How growth is managed, todayBefore

  • A PDF career ladder nobody can find
  • Training budget spent on courses that don't match roles
  • Promotion decisions based on who asked loudest
  • High potentials identified in a closed spreadsheet
  • Managers guessing at "what good looks like" next level
Time to fill critical roles internallySlow / opaque

How growth is managed hereAfter

  • Skills and levels defined once, visible to ICs and managers
  • Learning recommendations tied to gap analysis
  • Readiness signals feed calibration and succession
  • Employees see plausible paths, not vague "growth"
  • HR sees pipeline health by function and diversity
Time to fill critical roles internallyFaster / visible
How development works on Careersome

Five steps from role definition to ready successor.

Competencies and behaviours per grade.

01 / 05

Built from templates or your existing frameworks, editable without a consulting project every year.

Skills, paths, and readiness, next to performance.

Competencies, learning, and promotion criteria in one record, so development plans match what the business needs, not random course catalog picks.

Competency libraries

Define what "good" looks like by role and level, shared language for managers and ICs.

Visible career paths

Show plausible next steps and requirements, fewer "how do I get promoted?" conversations with no anchor.

Learning tied to gaps

Recommendations align to skill gaps from reviews, not generic annual training mandates.

IDPs with milestones

Track commitments, checkpoints, and outcomes alongside performance, one place for follow-through.

Readiness for succession

Feed readiness signals to succession and calibration, development isn't separate from who moves where.

Pipeline visibility

HR sees bench strength and diversity of pipelines by function, where to invest before roles go external.

Where development connects

LMS, content, and the manager workflow.

Assign learning, book mentors, and nudge completion, without another portal employees forget exists.

LMS / LXPCourse completion sync
SlackNudges & kudos
Careersome appPaths & IDPs
PerformanceGoals ↔ skills
SuccessionBench & readiness
CompensationPromotion pay
StoriesTalent risk read
CalendarMentor sessions
APIContent catalogs
PDFIDP exports
AlertsStalled paths
ZapierCustom hooks
Questions

Before you book a demo, what development leaders ask.

Do we need a full competency model on day one?

No, start from role families and grow. Partial coverage beats a perfect framework in a drawer.

Can we bring our own content?

Yes, SCORM, links, and internal workshops all attach to skills with completion tracking.

How do employees avoid "training for training's sake"?

Assignments tie to explicit gaps from assessments, not a generic catalog dump.

Does this replace our LMS?

It orchestrates learning against career data. Deep libraries can stay where they are, Careersome is the brain that assigns meaningfully.

How do unions or councils review this?

Promotion criteria and appeals workflows can mirror your governance, exports for consultation included.

Map one job family, end to end.

Pick engineering or commercial, we'll sketch levels, gaps, and learning hooks you can show leadership next week.